Day 1 Research @River4fun @RiverdotInc #RiverPts The conclusions are as follows; please correct me if I'm wrong! Thank you. Data: 1. yt-satUSD daily ≈ 1.2–1.8 River Points (25x reward) 2. rpt self-staking annualized 32% 3. Self-staking satUSD + mining, 1 face value mining efficiency = 1 yt 4. LP mining annualized for each pool exceeds 32%, not considering for now. Current market prices: yt = 0.02563u river point = 0.01872u 1u = 0.9247 satusdt + Topic: If we assume the pts price is stable, how much money is needed to produce 100 pts daily under three different plans? Conclusion: 1. 1.7u 2. 2130u 3. 3000u Pros and cons of the plans: 1. You have to wait until the season ends to settle, and the time to obtain returns may be later than just holding. It may not sell at a good price, and the time cost is relatively high. 2. Can be sold at any time, with the risk of principal loss. 3. No risk of any principal loss possible. 4. The LP plan may have surprises, depending on the token trading volume, the conclusion is relatively uncontrollable. If plan 1 hopes to utilize the Pendle circular loan strategy, costs can be further compressed by an order of magnitude. Therefore, I don't quite understand the conclusion on Twitter that buying pts is more cost-effective. I am a newcomer to River, and if there are any shortcomings in the above conclusions, guidance is welcome.